Running paid content as reporting.

"The Telegraph also understands that there are concerns within The Guardian about funded journalism on its website.

It confirmed that it is in discussions with the European Climate Foundation "regarding the funding of journalism projects".

The foundation lobbies for climate..."


Translation: The Guardian is paid to run roughly a dozen stories a week about climate. Right or wrong, it's not like they check; it's propaganda masquerading as science. How can you tell if anything they say is true?


From now, house style guide recommends terms such as ‘climate crisis’ and ‘global heating’

Instead of “climate change” the preferred terms are “climate emergency, crisis or breakdown” and “global heating” is favoured over “global warming”, although the original terms are not banned.

“We want to ensure that we are being scientifically precise"




2015 Guardian: Running paid content as reporting.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/media/11425580/Guardian-changed-Iraq-article-to-avoid-offending-Apple.html


2019 Guardian: From now, house style guide recommends terms such as ‘climate crisis’ and ‘global heating’
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/may/17/why-the-guardian-is-changing-the-language-it-uses-about-the-environment