November 2009
"We keep coming up against the belief that we've reduced mortality by 50 percent,” and when researchers poke holes in the evidence, people pound the pulpit."
"Whether this season's swine flu turns out to be deadly or mild, most experts agree that it's only a matter of time before we're hit by a truly devastating flu pandemic—one that might kill more people worldwide than have died of the plague and AIDS combined. In the U.S., the main lines of defense are pharmaceutical—vaccines and antiviral drugs to limit the spread of flu and prevent people from dying from it. Yet now some flu experts are challenging the medical orthodoxy and arguing that for those most in need of protection, flu shots and antiviral drugs may provide little to none. So where does that leave us if a bad pandemic strikes?"
See also the Globe & Mail, Dec 29, 2009 article: "How the flu shot became big business"