rs79.vrx.palo-alto.ca.us
Climate anomolies
Ratcheting back the climate hysteria


Climate: it's just math.

If anybody cares to look in the NOAA database of historical temperatures you can plainly see it's not warming. Until you look you do not actually know. If anybody cares to look in the 2012 IPCC Final Report you'll see there are 75% error bars in the sole "proof" CO2 affects climate. Meanwhile, while 1/5 of the world freaks out about some non-existent "warming" (more people believe in angels) the rate of death from pollution increases every year. It's up to 7 million a year now, so from 2000, 140 million people have died from pollution you never mention, while zero have died from climate. Man's biggest problem ? Lying politicians and dying print and TV media that will now print anything for money.
#TheyLie


'As the situation degenerates, people have to be offered stupid amusements, more frequently, for them to ignore what's actually going on." - Dr. Jordon Peterson



no_consensus
  World's top climate scientists told to 'cover up' the fact that the Earth's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years  Nasa climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record... but we're only 38% sure we were right  Global Warming More Moderate Than Worst-Case Models
 Where does this stuff come from?     The lawn of Trinity College is seen after being dug up by Extinction Rebellion climate protesters      Re-evaluating the role of solar variability on Northern Hemisphere temperature trends since the 19th century

Never mistake truth for consensus.


"97%+ of geologists agreed the continents were stable. It was Settled Science. Hundreds of research papers supported it. Overwhelming consensus. And wrong. And, oddly (not really, if you think about it a moment), it was not a geologist but a meteorologist, Alfred Wegener, who ultimately showed all the mutually agreeing geologists they had it all wrong; the continents move." - Dr. Michael K. Oliver

1) Never mistake consensus for truth. It took 300 years for "germ theory" to be accepted because the "scientific consensus" was tht "foul humors" caused disease. Consensus can be wrong. Also look at how it's measured and never mistake consensus for truth.

2) In the 2012 IPCC report, 75% error bars marred the proof CO2 affects climate

3) Because of this only 2.5% of the contributors signed off on it.

4) To correct this optics problem a grad student was commissioned and wrote Cook 2013 which showed 97% of scientists agree with the AGW theory.

5) Legates et. al. 2015 pointed out this 97% was actually only 75 out of 77 scientists - all of who were on climate grants. They also give a real % of world (not a cherry picked subset on grants) scientists who support the horribly flawed AGW hypothesis:. 0.3%.

Here's what an honest man looks like:

"“The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened,” Lovelock said.

“The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,” he said."

'I made a mistake' "As “an independent and a loner,” he said he did not mind saying “All right, I made a mistake.”

"He claimed a university or government scientist might fear an admission of a mistake would lead to the loss of funding."

(Ref)


pollution
 Smog returns to Bangkok  Breathing London air same as smoking 150 cigarettes a year, experts warn  Air pollution linked to seven million deaths globally per year  Air pollution: Half a million early deaths in Europe despite progress
 Tracking the toxic air that's killing millions  EU says one in eight deaths is linked to pollution   All organic farming. No dead coral.  Farm runoff  India air pollution at 'unbearable levels', Delhi minister says  The Great Barrier Reef   Air quality is slipping once again.  photos reveal what Los Angeles looked like before the US regulated pollution  New Research Links Air Pollution to Higher Coronavirus Death Rates  Lancet says WHO Air Pollution Safety Standards Still Unsafe  Lead in the US  Air pollution is responsible for more deaths each year than malnutrition, malaria, AIDS, or alcohol and drug abuse.

The real problem



rhetoric
 Why facts don't change our minds  You're not going to believe what I'm about to tell you  Science is often flawed. It's time we embraced that.
 5 Logical Fallacies That Make Humans Terrible at Democracy  Descartes’s 12  Tenets of Critical Thinking  The Dunning-Kruger Effect  How To Recognize A Fake News Story  After Mayan Apocalypse Failure, Believers May Suffer   Is this a rational discussion?  One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction.

Is not logic



space
  shifting
  rays

The final frontier



Climate%20Presentation%20Annotated%201-1-2010.pdf
Climate%20Presentation%20Annotated%201-1-2010.pdf
HowToLieWithStatistics.pdf
HowToLieWithStatistics.pdf
cook_2013t.jpg
cook_2013.jpg
xs sm lg
legates_2013t.jpg
legates_2013.jpg
xs sm lg
"It is the scientific community’s responsibility to ensure that, where possible, scientific findings are portrayed to the public via mass media outlets in a correct and responsible manner to prevent the perpetuation of misleading or erroneous findings."
- Alan J. Jamieson, and Paul H. Yancey, "On the Validity of the Trieste Flatfish: Dispelling the Myth"

“Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best, he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear his shoes, bathe, and not make messes in the house.”
- Heinlein

That article you just read... did you understand why what they said is true? or did you take their word for it? How does it compare to what we actually know about the planet? Global warming hysteria takes focus away from pollution .

The fundamentals of life on this planet:

"“The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened,” Lovelock said.

“The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,” he said."

'I made a mistake'
"As “an independent and a loner,” he said he did not mind saying “All right, I made a mistake.” He claimed a university or government scientist might fear an admission of a mistake would lead to the loss of funding."
http://web.archive.org/web/20120425004724/http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/23/11144098-gaia-scientist-james-lovelock-i-was-alarmist-about-climate-change?lite

"Leading (emph mine - rjs) the fight against climate change."
http://www.clintonfoundation.org/files/annualreport_cf_2010.pdf
More like upcycling polluters dollars into fake news about the weather.

Environmental groups were warned that some climate change ads could be seen as partisan during election period
Elections Canada says warning covers activities, ads identifying a candidate or party that cost $500 or more
The Canadian Press · Posted: Aug 19, 2019
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/environment-groups-warned-climate-change-real-partisan-1.5251763



https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/0.0,0.0/land_ocean/ann/7/1981-2010