rs79.vrx.palo-alto.ca.us

Merck pays Elsavier to publish a journal Merck made up which shows Merck products in a favorable light

Merck invents its own journal to publish bogus research findings to promote it's own products. Elsavier publishes this psuedoscience.


Merck drew up a "hit list" of doctors that needed to be "neutralized" because they criticized the now banned drug Vioxx.

See also the article "Vioxx killed half a million poeple". In China, melamine was used as a filler in baby formula resulting in 300,000 deaths and the west criticied the country for this. Yes many were imprisoned and a few were executed. Vioxx killed 500,000 people and what happened? Not much.


Baldness drug can cause irreversible impotence.


DECEMBER 06, 2019 Merck Whistleblower Case Proceeds Toward a Resolution

As the Merck MMR whistle blower case proceeds toward a resolution that increasingly appears to spell doom for Merck’s scandal ridden MMRII blockbuster, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) officials are scrambling to get Glaxo’s version of the MMR teed up to fill the coming vacuum.

Recap: Two senior Merck scientists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, filed their Federal whistleblower lawsuit in 2010 claiming Merck fraudulently added rabbit antibodies to human blood samples to gull FDA officials into believing the vaccine 95% effective and thereby win an MMR monopoly. When the scientists threatened to expose the fraud, Merck officials offered bribes, threatened them with prison and then destroyed the laboratory evidence in garbage bags.

Merck’s defective MMRII is currently causing dangerous Mumps epidemics in fully vaccinated adults across the globe. At FDA’s behest (GSK) recently published the results of US clinical trials for the hasty licensing of Glaxo’s (MMR) vaccine Priorix® (Klein et al. 2019). Knowing that no MMR can survive safety testing against an inert placebo, FDA allowed GSK to test Priorix against Merck’s MMR II. The results were so horrifying for both vaccine formulations that Glaxo and FDA decided against publishing them in the main paper burying them instead in a supplemental table within an addendum.

Table 6 displays the shocking results; Nearly 50% of vaccine recipients experienced adverse events within 42 days of vaccination and over 10% of these required emergency room visits. Roughly 2% of these adverse events were “serious” and 3.5% of vaccine recipients were diagnosed with a “new onset chronic disease” within 6 months of vaccination. These documented safety results are astronomically higher than the vaccine industry talking points which claim vaccine adverse events are “one-in-a-million”. They are much more in line with the results of the DHHS’s Lazarus study where 1 in 39 vaccine recipients showed an adverse reaction.

 


When half a million Americans died and nobody noticed

Was the US drug Vioxx responsible for far more deaths than has been acknowledged so far?

ARE American lives cheaper than those of the Chinese? It's a question raised by Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative, who has produced a compelling comparison between the way the Chinese dealt with one of their drug scandals – melamine in baby formula - and how the US handled the Vioxx aspirin-substitute disaster.

The Chinese scandal surfaced in 2008, shortly before the Beijing Olympics. Crooked dairymen diluted their milk products, then added a plastic chemical compound called melamine to raise the apparent protein content back to normal levels. Nearly 300,000 babies across China suffered urinary problems, with many hundreds requiring lengthy hospitalisation for kidney stones. Six died.

Long prison sentences were handed down and a couple of the guiltiest culprits were tried and executed for their role. Throughout these events, American media coverage was extensive, with appropriate sneering about the Chinese leadership's indifference to human life.

Four years earlier, in September 2004, Merck, one of America's largest pharmaceutical companies, issued a sudden recall of Vioxx, its anti-pain medication widely used to treat arthritis-related ailments.

The recall came just days after Merck discovered that a top medical journal was about to publish a study by an FDA (Food and Drug Administration) investigator indicating that the drug in question greatly increased the risk of fatal heart attacks and strokes and had probably been responsible for at least 55,000 American deaths during the five years it had been on the market.

It soon turned out Merck had known of potential lethal side effects even before launching Vioxx in 1999, but had brushed all such disturbing tests under the rug




fake: Merck pays Elsavier to publish a journal Merck made up which shows Merck products in a favorable light
https://web.archive.org/web/20090604161020/http://blog.bioethics.net/2009/05/merck-makes-phony-peerreview-journal/


hit list: Merck drew up a "hit list" of doctors that needed to be "neutralized" because they criticized the now banned drug Vioxx.
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/04/25/1626200/Drug-Company-Merck-Drew-Up-Doctor-Hit-List


limp: Baldness drug can cause irreversible impotence.
http://yourlife.usatoday.com/health/medical/menshealth/story/2011/03/Sexual-side-effects-from-Propecia-Avodart-may-be-irreversible/44787684/1


mmr: DECEMBER 06, 2019 Merck Whistleblower Case Proceeds Toward a Resolution
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/merck-whistleblower-case-proceeds-toward-a-resolution


vioxx: When half a million Americans died and nobody noticed
https://www.theweek.co.uk/us/46535/when-half-million-americans-died-and-nobody-noticed