Climate anomolies
Climate: what we know and what we don't know
“Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best, he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear his shoes, bathe, and not make messes in the house.” - Heinlein

That article you just read... did you understand why what they said is true? or did you take their word for it? How does it compare to what we actually know about the planet? Global warming hysteria takes focus away from pollution .

First, understand the very basics of life on this planet:

"“The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened,” Lovelock said.

“The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,” he said."

'I made a mistake'
"As “an independent and a loner,” he said he did not mind saying “All right, I made a mistake.” He claimed a university or government scientist might fear an admission of a mistake would lead to the loss of funding."

8th December 2010 13:24 GMT - A group of top NASA and NOAA scientists say that current climate models predicting global warming are far too gloomy, and have failed to properly account for an important cooling factor which will come into play as CO2 levels rise.

Looking back beyond just a couple of hundred years a different picture emerges: the world is cooling, not warming.

The UK is in danger of going dark.

Catastrophe Denied

A Critique of Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming Theory

Warren Meyer's excellent report analyzing the same data the the IPCC uses but without the tricks to prove a predetermined conclusion. Read the full report (90 pages) and decide for yourself. See also for co2 saturation data.

Why did Earth’s surface temperature stop rising in the past decade?

"Since the turn of the century, however, the change in Earth’s global mean surface temperature has been close to zero."

"Since 2000, temperatures have been warmer than average, but they did not increase significantly." Data courtesy of NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center.

A hypothesis that the heat was sequestered in the ocean abyss was proven incorrect by NASA in October of 2014 - "the cold waters of Earth's deep ocean have not warmed measurably since 2005", according to a new NASA study, leaving unsolved the mystery of why global warming appears to have stopped in 1998. It started in 1978. But there really has been no warming this century.

Global Warming Advocacy Science: a Cross Examination

A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fails to stand up to scrutiny.


Why you look foolish when you say "97% of the world's..."

Executive summary
The IPCC wanted to show all its contributers endorsed the IPCC conclusions, but the problem is they didn't at all. So a grad student and her thesis advisor - associate professor Peter Dolan tried to prove they did. Using a list of 10,000 scientists they threw 7000 away who might potentially disagree with the IPCC summary, only to find not as many as hoped endorsed it (~80%). After several sessions of removing disagreeing members, 77 people were identified as "proper" respondents and 75 of them believe the AGW hypothesis.

So, 75 scientists (97.4%) agree with the IPCC and 99.97 of the worlds scientists disagree with them.

Sources and references at the link.

Past and current Malaria spread
animals grizzly -  The rebound of the grizzly bear animals malaria -  Dafuq? animals monarch -  The fickle monarch
animals panda -  The Panda population has increased by 17%. animals snakes -  Snakes. No, really, snakes. animals squirrels -  Arctic ground squirrels unlock permafrost carbon

Not one of these doomsday scenarios has ever come true.

There is less ice today there compared to 1979 which is back when we were all fretting about another Ice Age. Still looking for the arctic death spiral.


They're liars. Here's how and why.

cosmic cern cosmic cern2 -  Cloud Mystery? (Swedish) cosmic core -  Temperature of earths core measured in 2013
cosmic gagged -  Gag order over CERN experiment cosmic lu -  CFC's and cosmic rays cosmic mars -  Earth and Mars are both coming out of an ice age cosmic miyahara -  Solar Activity and Climate, 2012 cosmic nasa -  Solar Variability and Terrestrial Climate cosmic novas -  Where cosmic rays come from.

Cosmic rays (as a function of megnetosphere strength) have a large if not overwhelming effect on climate. These papers explore that.


Metrics from the environment.

Data on extinctions.

no_consensus perception

Never mistake truth for consensus.

"97%+ of geologists agreed the continents were stable. It was Settled Science. Hundreds of research papers supported it. Overwhelming consensus. And wrong. And, oddly (not really, if you think about it a moment), it was not a geologist but a meteorologist, Alfred Wegener, who ultimately showed all the mutually agreeing geologists they had it all wrong; the continents move." - Dr. Michael K. Oliver

ozone nasa -  Big Ozone Holes Headed For Extinction By 2040

The hole in the ozone layer opened when it got warm (1976 - 1998) and began contracting in cooler years which are now so frequent the hole will be closed by about 2040.

As for CFC's, well, the models all failed and instead of a consistent drop in upper atmospheric chlorine by two parts per trillion per year, it measured out at +200 to -150 and there was no trace of a signal whatsoever.

So after ten years of looking there is no data to support in any way the idea that CFC's had anything to do with the ozone hole. The proof that verified the models an expensive global engineering change justified turned out to be false.

The expiry of DuPont's CFC based Freon (tm; "R12") Patent and subsequent taxpayer funding to remove all R12 in the world and replace CFC's with R34 based HCFC's that are "only 98%" as harmful must have been a coincidence. Be that as it may, the old CFC had economic advantages in cases and have been banned at great cost to the taxpayer for political and not scientific reasons.

"Perhaps the greatest use of TCE has been as a degreaser for metal parts. The demand for TCE as a degreaser began to decline in the 1950s in favor of the less toxic 1,1,1-trichloroethane. However, 1,1,1-trichloroethane production has been phased out in most of the world under the terms of the Montreal Protocol, and as a result trichloroethylene has experienced some resurgence in use as a degreaser."

"TCE is also used in the manufacture of a range of fluorocarbon refrigerants[11] such as 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane more commonly known as HFC 134a."

Without the manufactured crisis of the ozone layer hole DuPont would have had to pay for extraction of the R12, all the equipment to extract it and for the replacement materials and all that equipment to replace it. Instead they were paid to do this at taxpayer expense.

rhetoric beliefs -  Why facts don't change our minds

Meta problems with the understanding of climate.

Dyson founded the field of climate science and "got out when money corrupted it". Currey is an IPCC contributor and an expert on arctic ice. Linzen has some good proofs while Spencer is a NASA climate scientist and professor.

xs sm lg
xs sm lg