rs79.vrx.palo-alto.ca.us

How Swine Flu Killed the Healthy

"The reason, according to Polack, is that their immune systems' programming backfired. After looking at lung samples from 75 young and middle-aged adult victims of the 2009 pandemic, they found an uncanny amount of a protein called C4d, a molecule that normally binds to antibodies to form virus-fighting immune complexes."

"When antibodies fight a virus under normal conditions, Polack says, they call in C4d, a compound that can destroy viruses. In the case of flu, most people had antibodies to seasonally circulating influenza strains, but these antibodies were a poor match to the pandemic virus. Although they recognized the virus and latched on to it, they weren't able to stop it from replicating, says Polack. When the antibodies and the C4d formed the immune complexes, Polack speculates that the system spiraled out of control. Instead of punching holes in the viruses, the immune complexes punched holes in the victims' veins and flooded their lungs with water and plasma. "The immune system gets fooled into activating this particular immune defense, and it causes harm," says Niranjan Bhat, an infectious disease physician at Johns Hopkins Children's Center in Baltimore, Maryland, who was not part of the research.

This was less likely to happen in young children and infants, with few or no antibodies against seasonal flu strains, says Polack. And elderly people had antibodies to the H1N1 strain that circulated in the United States until 1957—a descendant of the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918—which are known to be a much better match to the 2009 H1N1 strain; so the flood of C4d generally didn't occur in them. When the team looked at lung samples from victims of the seasonal flu, they found only trace amounts of C4d, which seemed to confirm their suspicions.

Not everyone is convinced. "There's no doubt that those immune complexes are there," says virologist Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. "The question is, are those antibody complexes there because there's another problem, or are those antibodies there causing the problem?"

But epidemiologist Thomas Reichert of the Entropy Research Institute in Lincoln, Massachusetts, finds Polack's hypothesis completely plausible. There's not much that could cause this kind of lung damage except an invasion of T lymphocytes (the immune system's "warrior cells"), he says, and Polack found no evidence of that. The immune system's overreaction, says Reichert, is "kind of a last-ditch way of handling something. ... If we can't identify you specifically enough, but we know there's a lot of you, we're just going to blow the whole damn place up."


Scurvy in hospitalized elderly patients.

12% of elderly patients had scurvy.


So what does that mean? The immune system went nuts and the cure killed the patient. How did this happen? First, some conditions had to be true because if you had survived the 1957 flu, this did not happen:

...elderly people had antibodies to the H1N1 strain that circulated in the United States until 1957—a descendant of the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918—which are known to be a much better match to the 2009 H1N1 strain; so the flood of C4d generally didn't occur in them.


If you wern't old enough to accumulate a lifetime of various flu antibodies you were ok:

This was less likely to happen in young children and infants, with few or no antibodies against seasonal flu strains


So it appears some people reacted badly the logic goes like this:
  1. If you are old enough to have immunity to the 1957/1819 (H1) strain, this didn't affect you.
  2. If you were young enough to not have a lifetime of various flu antibodies, you were fine.
  3. If you had a lifetime of various flu antibodies but no exposure to the H1 flu you were at risk, some died some did not.


Would it be fair to call this "Vaccine pollution?" As a long time proponent of this ancient science I have to be able to say in good faith it's both safe and effective. Amplification of cytokine storms is not supposed to be part of the plan.

It would be informative to compare the serum selenium in the patients that died compared to the ones that survived. What's missing from this discussion is the levels of GPx3 in there patients. It's strongly suspected the dead had none while those that survived had more robust antioxidant systems.